Director’s Comment:
Abdurrahman Al-Lahem is a law abiding Saudi lawyer who defends his fellow citizens in Saudi
courts. Mr. Al-Lahem is known for his courage to challenge the Saudi courts’ arbitrary
deliberations and the heavy handedness of the ferocious Saudi Arabian religious police. He
defends democratic reformers, rape victims, and religious minorities. Mr. Al-Lahem does his
uphill work according to the Saudi religious law. Due to the severity of the cases he
undertakes and the victims involved, Mr. Al-Lahem has become a hero in Saudi Arabia and
amongst regional and global human rights NGOs. This hard earned acknowledgment of his
courage to speak the truth to power is not a practice the Saudi system approves of or wants
to encourage for fear of more demands in other areas by other Saudis.
Because of his peaceful insistence of seeing the law applied fairly and equally, as written
in Saudi books, Al-Lahem has been in and out of prison for many years. In addition, his
right to practice law has been revoked, and so has his right to travel to receive awards
bestowed upon him by human right groups. Like other non-royal Saudi personalities who gained
prominence and were dismissed from their jobs (i.e. former oil ministers, Sheikhs Ahmed Zaki
Yamani and his predecessor, Abdullah Hamood Al-Tarayki), Mr. Al-Lahem is perceived as a
potential threat to the Saudi ruling family. The ruling elites fear that prominent citizens
could overshadow them and gain grassroots support.
Therefore, they believe that these people must be dismissed, imprisoned, placed under house
arrest or stripped of anything that gives a person’s life meaning, as in the case of Mr.
Al-Lahem. CDHR calls on the U.S. and European governments, as well as all human rights NGOs,
to censure the Saudi government for its unjustified restrictions on Mr. Al-Lahem and the
dozens of other Saudi human rights advocates of free movement, including travel outside of
the country.
Read More
Director’s Comment:
Saudi Arabia is ranked among the nations with the highest beheading rate per capita in the
world. This is due to the Saudi government’s austere religious establishment’s
interpretation of the Quran and application of its severe Shariah law. As illustrated in the
attached article, issuing death sentences by religious government officials depends upon the
mood of the issuer. Sheikh Saleh Al-Lohaidan is a notorious religious radical who occupies a
very powerful position in the Saudi religious system. He is known for encouraging young
religiously brainwashed Saudis to travel to Iraq and kill Americans and others in the name
of Islam.
Although this ostensibly religious man and his like use Islam to justify whatever harm they
wish to inflict upon others, their end goal is power on their behalf and on behalf of the
Saudi ruling family. The intended objective of forbidding people to partake in any
recreational indulgences, as highlighted in the attached article, is designed to keep the
population focused entirely on religious rituals and traditions that emphasize their total
submission to God, as well as to the rulers and religious men like Al-Lohaidan.
Read More
Director’s Comment:
It is public knowledge that the relationships between King Abdullah and his senior brothers,
especially Interior Minister Prince Naïf, Governor of Riyadh Prince Salman, and to a lesser
degree, Defense Minister and Crown Prince Sultan, have been tense and less cordial than
between previous kings and their siblings. King Abdullah, whose ascendance to the throne in
August of 2005 was considered sheer luck rather than family preference, has had thorny
relationships with his half brothers, the powerful and long time power wielders known as the
Sudairi Seven. Many Saudis speculated that Abdullah’s predecessor, King Fahd, was kept alive
on heavy medications and on a life support system for ten years (1995-2005) so that Abdullah
would not ascend to the throne.
According to Saudi analysts and people close to Abdullah, his relations did not seem to
improve when he became king. Many Saudis believe that if it were not for Abdullah’s control
over the fierce and powerful National Guard, he may have been either deposed or eliminated.
Recent reports hinted at an attempt to get rid of Abdullah by removing his supporters in the
National Guard, but this plan was discovered and aborted. If this had happened, the
consequences could have plunged the country into chaos and forced the United States to
intervene militarily in order to stabilize the country and ensure the preservation of the
large quantities of oil, as well as its production and delivery. Saudis are increasingly
convinced that the biggest threat to the stability of Saudi Arabia may come from within the
royal family.
Read
More
Director’s Comment:
Many Saudis, especially intellectuals, but also people across the board, are pushing for
better governing systems to replace their present dormant institutions. The Saudi
government’s reforms have been put on hold and in some cases things are going backwards.
Incarcerations of reformers for their simple recommendations, such as improving prison
conditions, are common practice.
Illegal and unjustified arrests are rising, and the authorities are fighting amongst each
other as to what is permissible and what is not. Censorship remains very high and perceived
violators of strict political, social and economic codes are taken to prisons without
specific charges. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression, as well as religious
tolerance, remain severely restricted and citizens’ self-regulation is as high as ever.
Unemployment rates are very high, as is inflation, which makes it difficult for the majority
of the population to make ends meet. King Abdullah speaks of reforms and some people believe
he means to implement them, but he has been rebuffed by his senior brothers, according to
reliable sources in and outside the country.
Read More
Director’s Comment:
“Ruwaida al-Habis, right, sits next to her two injured brothers Muhammad, center, and
Al-Hassan at a Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2008. When Ruwaida
al-Habis' father and two brothers were burned in a house fire, she had no choice but to
break Saudi Arabia's ban on women drivers – getting behind the family car's wheel to get
them to a clinic fast.”
Under normal conditions and in modern societies, the story of this courageous woman would
have been the normal, logical and right thing to do. Saudi Arabia is the only nation on this
planet where women are officially banned from driving, even in life or death situations.
Such a destructive, unnatural and costly policy is blamed on tradition and religion, when in
fact there were no cars when Islam was founded. The means of transportation fourteen and a
half centuries ago consisted of camels, horses and donkeys. Like everyone else, women rode
these animals to get from place to place.
The costs to the Saudi people, on all fronts, are high as a result of excluding women from
the decision making processes and denying them their basic natural and divine rights to
explore their full potentials and use them to build a prosperous, safe, tolerant and stable
country. Even under formidable man-made conditions, Saudi women never cease to demand their
rights and to advocate tolerance, transparency, accountability, and equal rights for all
citizens. They deserve our admiration, gratitude and support.
Read More
Director’s Comment:
Saudi Arabia has become synonymous with terrorism, extremism and religious intolerance,
especially against non-Muslims. What is not known to religious freedom activists, government
officials and many NGOs, and unknown even to many Saudis, is the exclusion and condemnation
of a sizable Saudi citizen minority, the Ismaelis. Tucked in the agriculturally and
archeologically rich foothills of the Saudi-Yemeni boarder, in Najran, the Ismaelis are
considered “infidels” and consequently punished by any means their majority Sunni
compatriots deem appropriate for non-“true Muslims.” It is estimated that there are about
one million Ismaelis in Saudi Arabia, the majority of which live in Najran.
According to a newly-released and thoroughly-researched report by the highly respected Human
Rights Watch group, the Ismaelis are treated in ways that should be reserved for criminals.
Najran was annexed by the Saudi-Wahhabi establishment in 1934. Despite their ethnic and
religious minority status, the Saudi-Wahhabi men of the Najran were and still are the
dominant power due to their control of the national wealth, support from the government and
their compulsive appetite to use brutal force to make sure loyalty is secured.
CDHR promotes Saudi national unity, security, equality and access to jobs at all levels for
all citizens, regardless of gender, ethnicity, religious orientation, lifestyle or origin.
To ensure these necessary values, decentralization of power, religious freedom, distribution
of the national treasure and empowerment of women must be implemented in Saudi Arabia.
Discriminating against minority Muslims because of religious rituals and orientations will
only push a sizable and strong segment of Saudi society to seek support from their
counterparts in Iran, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq and other parts of the
Muslim world. Additionally, religious oppression and intolerance at home and incitement
against non-Muslims will bring harm to Saudi Arabia including external intervention no Saudi
would like to entertain.
Read More
Read More, Arabic
Contact Us:
You may automatically unsubscribe from this list at any time by visiting the following URL:
http://www.cdhr.info/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/[list]/
If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break this automatic unsubscribe mechanism.
If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at:
This mailing list is announce-only.
The listserv for The Center for Democracy and Human Rights in Saudi Arabia
Any and all information given to CDHR is strictly confidential and shall not be disclosed to any other party for any reason.